Within this research domain, I am interested in evaluating the different possible explanations for why collaborative inhibition occurs, as well as the factors that increase and decrease the extent to which it occurs. Performance of the nominal groups is often better than that of the collaborative groups (i.e., collaborative inhibition), suggesting there is something about collaborating with others that interferes with or otherwise impairs remembering. Then, the performance of the nominal groups (people who didn’t work together to recall, but whose output was nonetheless combined as if they were a group) is compared to the performance of the collaborative groups mentioned above. That is, after the individuals have recalled what they remember, the individuals are divided into after-the-fact groups and the group is given credit for what was recalled by the individuals. Collaborative inhibition is revealed by creating “nominal” groups from the individuals. ![]() The usual finding is that memory performance for the groups (averaged across all groups) is better than the memory performance for the individuals (averaged across all individuals). Experimental data show that when animals are interrupted while executing a task, they optimize the use of prospective memory and retrospective memory in. It is revealed in the laboratory by having individuals try to remember information on their own versus having individuals try to remember information in collaboration with others. The processes of generation and recognition.Īnother such research interest is collaborative inhibition in memory, which can occur when a group of individuals works together to try to remember information. When it does not, as well as the role of organization and distinctiveness in In understanding when the generation-recognition model can account for recall versus Within this research domain, I am interested Recall, and then they try to recognize the generated candidates as having beenĬandidates that are both generated and recognized are then recalled theĬandidates that are generated but not recognized are not recalled. First, they generate possible candidates for Information from memory, they do so according to a two-stage process. According to this model, when people recall Such research interest is the generation-recognition model of recall. To a variety of different issues in memory research. I am interested in applying this distinction ![]() May produce better memory than either type alone. Processing benefit memory, and in fact, the combination of both types of processing Distinctive processing refers to thinkingĪbout or attending to the differences among to-be-remembered information. To-be-remembered information (e.g., the words in a list). Processing refers to thinking about or attending to the similarities among
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |